Topic > Alcohol Advertising - 859

Alcohol Advertising There is a great debate going on today about the legality of advertising alcohol on television. Since we are all centered on the stereotype of the perfect human being, there are cases with alcohol that put our names to shame. Does this give us the right to ban advertising on such a product? This is the question we ask ourselves every day. When we turn on the television and watch a show we love, whether it's a sports game or a crime scenario, there are always product ads on the television. In this short one-minute or even thirty-second commercial, manufacturers try to convince us to buy the products by providing good examples and influencing the product itself. Even with a simple commercial for natural male enhancement we always see a smile on the face of the interested parties, but does this ethically mean it is wrong or right? At this level there is no evidence that there is an error in the producers' moral philosophy because, by definition, moral philosophy means “the area of ​​philosophy that deals with theories of ethics, of how we should live our lives.” In this area there are three divisions: Metaethics, Normative Ethics and Applied Ethics. Going into metaethics, he explains what morality is, and as far as the United States knows, there is a morality that no one is perfect, there will always be cases of mistakes, but the thing that brings us to who we are is and always will be our morality. We are only human, no matter where we reside. The result and opinion on the debate on banning alcohol advertising on television is that advertising should not be banned, because in the United States we have the right to freedom and also the drinking age is twenty-one. . It is perfectly legal to drink, and to show what types of drinks exist, manufacturers such as hard liquor manufacturers promote their products in much the same way that most cough and cold medicines, arthritis medicines, and for health, through television commercials. social responsibility, there is an ethical theory “according to which an entity, be it a government or an organization, has a responsibility towards society, but this responsibility can be "negative". In that it is a responsibility to refrain from acting (resistance attitude) or it can be "positive", in the sense that there is a responsibility to act (proactive attitude)).