Gay activists argue that same-sex "marriage" is a matter of social freedoms like the fight for racial equity in the 1960s . This is false. Above all, sexual conduct and race are essentially distinctive substances. A man and a woman who need to get married could be distinguished in their qualities: one could be dark, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these distinctions constitute an unrealistic barrier to marriage. The two men are still man and woman, and in this way they are considered the premises of nature. Same-sex “marriage” limits nature. Two people of the same sex, who pay little attention to their race, wealth, stature, intelligence or popularity, will never have the ability to marry due to an unfavorable and invalid natural chance. Furthermore, acquired and immutable racial qualities cannot be opposed to non-hereditary and variable conduct. There is fundamentally no similarity between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and "marriage" between two people of the same race.