Yes, to some extent I agree that they need to worry about the threat of exposing sensitive hotel data and also the reduction of bandwidth charges due to excessive use of their internal network. But requiring customers to fully utilize paid connection to meet network security and performance goals is not the right way to proceed. Furthermore, trying to get FCC permissions to restrict guests' personal hotspots just because the Wi-Fi falls into the unlicensed spectrum category of Part 15 devices is not justifiable in any sense. Blocking personal hotspot connections can still be considered an illegal procedure as the network operator prevents the user from asserting his fundamental rights to use the Internet. The most incomprehensible part of this issue lies in the commercial abuse of authority. I had to shell out almost $250 just to get internet access, which is absolutely not justifiable. Monetizing public internet connections is understandable, but again, to what extent? There are many reasons why some public networks fail to remain secure. It could be because an ineffective technical team can't come up with ideas and techniques that can strengthen the network security backbone. As someone with a respectable technical background in the telecom industry, I would definitely try to hire