Topic > Fea analysis of the impact of Pumpkin Ball on the console

SummaryIntroductionLiterature reviewValidation and conclusionIntroductionThe console is the part that creates a bridge of interaction between man and machine. The console assembly includes the HMI (human machine interface) and the console shell. The console shell is the part on which the HMI part is mounted. HMI (human machine interface) includes all the electronic part which includes LED bulbs, buttons, PCB etc. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay The console of the washing machine is one of the important parts when considering the user's safety as it contains many electronic components and their breakage could lead to safety issues which are given top priority while designing any product. Therefore, every console design made must pass certain UL tests without which the product cannot be launched on the market [1]. Among the many safety tests performed on the console, one of the most important tests is the ball impact test. The ball is actually a basketball filled with sand up to 1/3 of its volume and impacted on the console. The test looks a lot like the pendulum impact test but the only difference between the two is that the pumpkin ball is deformable during the impact, which makes it more dynamic and difficult to study. The need to perform the ball impact test on the console can be understood in an instance where a major impact occurs on the console directly due to an unknown reason. Therefore, the full impact can damage the console. The primary concern is access to the live wire after damage. The main goal of this article was to correlate simulation with experimentation. During new product development, when a console is designed, the only way to verify whether the product will pass the UL standard safety test during the design phase is through simulation. So, the only way to understand the accuracy of the simulation is to study the behavior of the console when hit by the ball and compare it with the real experiment with the help of the accelerometer. Literature Review Everywhere S. Sridhar and Sushilkumar Vishwakarma worked on modeling the behavior of dry sand with DEM for better impact prediction with the aim of creating a standard simulation model capturing the behavior of ball filled with sand particles when it is hit on the concrete wall and validate it with the experimental model. The simulation results showed close proximity to the experimental results [2]. Hamidreza Mahmoudi worked on bonnet modeling in LS-DYNA for pedestrian research with an attempt to develop a finite element model for pedestrian kinematics analysis with the help of LS Dyna and hypermesh software. For comparison with the experiment, peak acceleration and impact duration were used [3]. Edwin Fasanella and Karen Jackson worked on describing best practices for aircraft impact modeling using explicit nonlinear dynamic finite element codes such as LS-Dyna. In crash analysis, the most concerning point is the magnitude and duration of peak acceleration. Experimental data analysis and digital filtering are also discussed [4]. The report of SMP Svensk on the requirements and test methods for the impact of the oscillating element for which the accelerometer is used during the experiment and the results are compared in g units [5]. Frank, Stefan and Marika worked on material models for polymers subjected to impact loads providing a.