In this scenario, the key stakeholders are employees, who in turn influence customers, shareholders, suppliers and the community. If Roger Jacobs were allowed to remain at Shellington Pharmaceuticals and continue with his current unethical behavior, the company's employees would not be satisfied with this outcome. Their constant mistreatment would contribute to lower morale which could heavily affect their job performance and how they interact with customers. As a result, if customers are not treated fairly by employees, they may turn their back on the company and stop supporting its business. This worst-case scenario would result in lost profits for the company, with financial repercussions for shareholders. With the loss of customers and low profits, Shellington Pharmaceuticals would not only gain an unfavorable reputation within the community, but the company could potentially be unable to pay suppliers for the products they need to continue operating their activity. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay In the opposite scenario where Roger Jacobs is fired from the organization, key stakeholders would still be greatly affected, but for the better. In this case, employees would be free from the constant harassment they are accustomed to. Without Jacobs' inappropriate behavior and derogatory remarks, their performance would improve significantly because employees would now be able to focus more intently on their work. Therefore, by regaining appreciation for their work, employees will positively improve the company's customer relationships, leading to greater customer satisfaction and a greater likelihood of returning customers. Having more satisfied customers means that the company will earn more profits. As a direct result, Shellington will not owe any money to its shareholders and the company will be able to continue purchasing from their suppliers and providing medicines to the community at large. There are several problems with how Shellington Pharmaceuticals treats its employees. The most widespread problem is that the company does not appear to effectively mediate interpersonal conflicts between its employees. For example, the work environment at Shellington is neither physically nor psychologically safe due to Jacobs' numerous instances of sexual harassment and his verbal mistreatment of his subordinates. The fact that this unethical behavior continues to resurface highlights the possibility that the numerous complaints from disgruntled employees are not being adequately addressed and that the perpetrator, in this case Roger Jacobs, is not being adequately disciplined for his actions. Furthermore, it can be inferred that the president of the company has financial gain as his top priority as he insists that Harry Rull let Jacobs' behavior go unnoticed due to his success. There are also some issues with how Shellington employees treat the organization. For example, since an employee can be fired from a company based solely on his or her job performance, it is possible that Roger Jacobs, having received many stellar performance reviews, is taking advantage of this policy and getting away with his unprofessional conduct without the fear of dismissal. Another problem is that the sexual harassment charges against Jacobs have been dropped multiple times. This may be due to a lack of evidence, implying that the employees who made the complaint may not have been entirely honest about.