Topic > Destiny and free will in Slumdog Millionaire and The Great Gatsby

The 2008 film Slumdog Millionaire directed by Dany Boyle and the novel The Great Gatsby, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald published in 1925, explores the truth of destiny of both the protagonists regardless of their social context. The director and author used representation, symbolism and imagery to open the eyes of contemporary audiences and demonstrate the power of destiny. This extraordinary playwright and author included descriptive and figurative imagery that emphasized values, attitudes, and beliefs. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. Brilliantly, the author of the book and the director of the film have a social context opposite to that of their protagonists. The novelist conceived Gatsby as the protagonist, a rich and powerful man, and this is in contrast to the film's protagonist, Jamal, who comes from the slums of Mumbai and works as a tea server. The portrayal of the fate of both protagonists The relationship has been shown in different types of text, novel and film. Interestingly, each of these works depicts a character pursuing a love interest. Here are two characters, Gatsby and Jamal, from very different social backgrounds who had very different outcomes in their search for a love interest. Gatsby's free will in choosing to believe that he can win back the love of his life Daisy through his wealth and social success. In particular, this belief is successfully represented in the phrase “Can't you repeat the past? Because of course you can!” in which it shows how Gatsby's fate will be to reunite with Daisy again. However, in an additional chapter of the novel, Gatsby's plan ultimately turns out to be out of his control. When he realizes this, Gatsby accepts death and blames himself for Myrtle's loss. In the end, Daisy chose to stay with Tom. Gatsby chooses to try to win her back, but fails. Furthermore, this shows that Gatsby's wealth and status do not matter. This is in contrast to Jamal's situation in scene 7. Jamal in Slumdog Millionaire chooses to participate in the game show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" as he believed it was the best way to find Latika and won. After the show he goes to train station and sees Latika. This is where he lived happily ever after (it is written). Obviously, the representation of destiny was addressed in all the stories. Both stories were shared with the public to prove that money can't buy happiness. But fate controls much of what happens in both plays, helping Jamal and stopping Gatsby. Since Slumdog Millionaire and The Great Gatsby are seemingly opposite texts, both Boyle and Fitzgerald used symbolism to convey how fate is the true prevailing force. Regardless of different social statuses, both upper and lower classes place value on money. The skilled author and playwright used monotonous color symbols - green in The Great Gatsby and yellow in Slumdog Millionaire - illustrating how the characters' destiny is to achieve wealth and, consequently, to make their life worth it love interest. Surprisingly, the green light is a symbol for Gatsby, despite his fate that through his wealth and money, he could win Daisy back but in the long run, he only ends up struggling alone and haunting his lonely and heartbreaking destiny. “Gatsby believes in the green light, in the orgastic future that year after year recedes before us. Then it escaped us, but it doesn't matter - tomorrow we will run faster, we will stretch our arms more... And one morning.