In this case study, we have young Billy Simmons who is a very talented tennis player. Growing up, the Simmons family played mixed doubles, various singles combinations or just played for fun at the predominantly white Forest Hills Country Club. The Simmons family is the only African American family to join the county club. As Billy grew up, he became a repeat age group winner and ended up becoming the club champion. Billy only competed against Caucasians and began to realize that many of them, along with their parents, were racist and unethical. He began to hear the first racist insults from the parents of the kids he was competing against and some of his opponents were cheating on phone calls to gain unfair advantages. All of this was new to Billy and caused his performance to decline. The more his performance and confidence dropped, the more parents and players used racial slurs and cheated on line calls. After discussing with his father, Billy learned that he too had faced the same issues while playing intercollegiate basketball. Through great focus and determination, Billy returned to high-level performance and reached the top 10 in the state of Georgia. Billy's passion was to enroll at the University of Southern Georgia because they had a top-notch tennis program. He received many college scholarship offers from other schools, but still decided to attend the University of South Georgia anyway. Billy had heard rumors that Coach Vines had never had an African-American player on his tennis team and people had heard him make derogatory comments about African-American players on other teams. Despite the rumors, Billy still wanted to play tennis for USG. On the first day of practice, Billy arrived at the tennis courts early and talked to Coach Vines about trying out for the team. After a week of testing in which Billy outshone the rest of the players, he was not chosen to be part of the team. Billy called his father who then spoke to Coach Vines. Dr. Simmons then took it a step further and arranged a meeting with the athletic director, Bruce Holcombe. Dr. Simmons had a strong feeling that Billy had been discriminated against based on his race. This case study decision will be seen through the eyes of Bruce Holcombe as he presents counterarguments on behalf of Coach Vines. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay There are a couple of unethical issues that need to be addressed, but the main unethical issue is that Coach Vines discriminated against Billy based on his race and not his performance. As a result, Billy will not be able to make the University of South Georgia tennis team. Since Billy was clearly one of the best players at the week-long tryouts, we know that he did not make the team based on his performance. Another unethical issue is that people have heard that Coach Vines has made derogatory comments about African Americans on other tennis teams they have faced. These problems primarily challenge the values ​​of integrity, fairness and respect for character. Integrity is defined as the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles, or moral rectitude. Coach Vines is clearly not showing integrity because he isn't being honest about why Billy didn't make the team. Billy is clearly one of the best players and hasn't made the team yet. Fairness is defined as a treatment or behaviorimpartial and fair, without favoritism or discrimination. Coach Vines never had an African American player play for him and despite how good Billy was, Coach Vines still decided not to put him on the team. Coach Vines has shown that he is not impartial towards black players, despite their physical abilities. How can someone who is no better than Billy make the team? Character is defined as the aggregate of characteristics and traits that form the individual nature of a person or thing. Coach Vines has clearly shown us that he does not have a good character. He cut Billy based on the color of his skin and not his performance. Additionally, people are said to have heard him make derogatory comments about African-American players they faced. A man of good character would never do or say these things, especially in front of his players or coaches. Some questions that could be asked regarding the issue could be: "Why can't Coach Vines be more tolerant of African Americans and accept them for their value to the team instead of their physical appearance?" “What kind of history does Coach Vines have that makes his perception of African Americans what it is now?” There are many ethical questions that need to be asked of everyone involved. Why wasn't Billy made the team if he was clearly one of the best players? Why has an African American player never played for Coach Vines? Is Coach Vines setting a good example for the University of South Georgia tennis program? Did Billy have a good attitude during the weekly tryouts? Was Billy ever late or missed a day during week-long auditions? What criteria does Coach Vines use to select his players? Did Dr. Simmons jump the gun when he accused Coach Vines of discriminating against Billy based on running and not performance? All of these are questions that need to be looked at carefully because there may be something extremely important that all of us may be missing. Coach Vines clearly ignored ethical decisions when he decided to cut Billy. He had no sound reasoning, statements of principle, or rational argument when he made his decision. Furthermore, he made his decision based on how he felt and feelings cannot dictate judgment because they are not always rational. Coach Vines also did not demonstrate the criteria of good moral reasoning. It has demonstrated that it is not free from bias, fraud or injustice, that it is inconsistent with past and present actions, and that it is not attentive to all moral and non-moral decisions. There is one ethical theory that is clearly shown and that is selfishness. It is the belief that all people act in self-interest. Coach Vines cut Billy based on the color of his skin and didn't care how good he was. Because of Coach Vines' personal views on African Americans, he made a decision that would make him happy and fulfilled. Stakeholders in this situation include Coach Vines, Billy, Bruce Holcombe, Dr. Simmons, the tennis program, and the University of South Georgia. Everyone plays a vital role in this situation. Coach Vine's decision affects Billy and Dr. Simmons because they firmly believe that Billy was discriminated against based on his race and not his performance. If Coach Vines is found guilty of discriminating against Billy based on his race, he could be fired. Billy is directly affected because he has always dreamed of playing tennis at USG, and that may not be possible, especially if Coach Vines proves he is not discriminating. Bruce Holcombe is impressed because he now has to intervene on behalf of Billy and Doctor Simmons for.