“Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do” is a description of the state Political scene American. The book's authors offer several reasons why they came to the conclusions they did. The book's overall theme puts to rest the idea that elites lean more left while the lower class aligns itself with more conservative ideals. For some areas of the United States this may certainly be true. What Gelman says is that looking at the economic collapse is important. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay When you look only at state voting demographics, you deny important information about who votes for both parties. One of the most important points is that in poorer states, social class is a better indicator of how votes will be distributed. The correlation between wealth and politics is less imperative in wealthier states. This concept. This is true even when considering the demographics of the county. This can also be explained through the disintegration of religion within states. When we generally think of the conservative right we think of social and economic conservatism. On the left there are more social liberal tendencies accompanied by economic conservatism. Now the rich right is doubly conservative economically because they can easily match it to their social tendencies. The wealthy left tends not to be this way because of the ideals of the DNC party. Each individual party has general positions on particular issues and influences its voters in this way. Above is what I have found to be the explanation for why richer states turn blue and richer states turn red. There are such differences today in the two parties that dominate our politics. Gelman's driving force is that wealth and religious states offer critical information about the demographics of voting in our country. We see the clear “Blue and Red” diagrams in the mainstream media, but many of these media outlets come from New York and Washington DC, where the general affluent population is more liberal. They overlook important information about specific voter turnout. Gelman worked on many different points of view. He gathered information from other countries like Canada and went back to data from the early 1900s to paint a clear picture of how these economic swings affect the overall red and blue. The synthesis of everything boils down to two points of thought. The religious leanings of Democratic voters in blue states are secular, while Republican voters regularly practice their faith and tend to be more conservative. This is true for most wealthy individuals. The second point is that rich states tend to go blue, but rich people in poor states tend to side with the RNC and its ideals. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Among easy-to-read and digest graphics Gelman and his information paint a picture of a broken political system, separated by wealth and a culture war. Whether someone votes blue or red shows us how this can be traced back locally to wealth, religion and party ideals.