Topic > Analysis of Orwell's "Politics and the English Language"

The content of Orwell's thesis states that political language is diluting our English language, and when this happens, the language takes away the depth and quality of your personal thoughts. This causes a significant decline in general communication skills and intelligence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Brief analysis of Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" in his In the essay, Orwell catalogs some of the most important vices. Metaphors of Death: A metaphor is trivial and has numerous definitions that define it. It is generally used when the author takes over knowledge and understanding of the metaphor, instead thinking about their own metaphor. They can also often be a production of the past and can be incorporated inappropriately. Operators or false limbs: there are sentences that take the place of “proper” nouns and/or verbs, what is described as having. egalitarianism to the best selected words. Pretentious Diction: Countless words that are used to emphasize an opinion and/or bias, making it unaffiliated, unbiased, and completely analytical. Meaningless words are normally generalized words that contain a limited and restricted value, relative to the topic at hand. What are the six fundamental questions that a scrupulous writer must ask himself? What am I trying to say? What words will express it? I could say it more briefly ?What picture will make it clearer? Is this image fresh enough to have an effect? Did I say something that was avoidably strange? Orwell is particularly interested in the power of language when it comes to political writing. Find a quote that you think best explains this concern. “I have not considered the literary use of language here, but simply language as a tool for expressing and not for hiding or preventing thought. Stuart Chase and others have come close to claiming that all abstract words are meaningless, and have used this as a pretext to advocate a kind of political quietism. Since you don't know what fascism is, how can you fight against fascism? It is not necessary to accept absurdities like this, but we must recognize that the current political chaos is linked to the decay of language and that some improvements can probably be made starting from the verbal part. which Orwell says will prevent bad writing: Don't use metaphors, similes, or other common rhetorical figures in writing. don't use long words where you can use short words instead. If you can cut a word, then make sure you do it. Always use the active voice when you can rather than the passive voice. Avoid using a foreign phrase, scientific word, or slang word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. Break any of these rules before you say something overtly barbaric. In my opinion, the most important rules would be numbers 3 and 6. By not following rule 3, the reader will end up drifting further away from the points represented. Just as rule 6 is a very strong rule since saying barbaric things will not only discredit the writer and his point of view but will also delegitimize him. Orwell discusses language, not in terms of literature, but in terms of politics. In a well-developed paragraph, explain your opinion on the issue of language and power. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay I assume that the origin of language is the oil in the engine to politics. The quality of a language can determine the success and power of that particular engine..