There is definitely controversy about the teen equity framework and whether they should focus more on rehabilitation or discipline. I believe all states should continue to expand their focus on strengthening the equity framework among adolescents, including discipline as prevention rather than restoration. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay I believe the adolescent equity framework should focus on discipline. In case a teenager needs to behave so appallingly and opt for a conscious choice like an adult, he should be tempted and considered an adult. Very often people are overly lenient or give a lighter sentence to a teenager because he is so young and they feel bad for him for unknown reasons. If the discipline isn't brutal enough, they don't take advantage of their mistake, most likely feel like they made a quick one, and will presumably repeat a similar or more terrible mistake. I don't believe extreme discipline should apply in every circumstance, but specific situations should be treated as adults. There are currently factors that a teen judge must consider before trying a teen in adult court. . The elements are: the reality of the crime, the level of development of the adolescent, the precedents (assuming them) and the probability that the adolescent will be reintegrated into the adolescent framework. Currently, numerous state laws provide for an increase in transfers of young litigants from adolescent court to adult court due to additional serious wrongdoing. I think the teen equity system has some significant setbacks, but I don't think it should be reversed. Actualizing the difference in emphasizing discipline will restore adolescent offenders more successfully. The harshest convictions or sanctions are for those who engage in genuinely bad behavior or repeated reprehensible gatherings. Imposing a sentence on an adult will show them that their bad behavior is not a joke and they will be less willing to insult again. The best solution for a powerful pre-adult value system would be a mixed option, with an exchange of guardianship with adult court. this would merge the teaching of vindication and aversion. In any case this would be an excessive option as it hinders the method due to the case-by-case examination. Switching dominance not only leads to a harsher, more authentic sentence, but it also establishes a connection with the person who made a real mistake. It likewise influences the open decision to dislike the juvenile court process with which they are deprived. So, towards the completion of the technique you can feel completely humbled, this is something worth being grateful for. Education and harsher sentences will allow responsible savage groups to go off the beaten track, influencing them more to anchor everyone in the system. This will hold immature responsible groups accountable for their criminal conduct. These movements are more effective control of adolescents requiring less of dealing with an immature person who has committed certain crimes as an adult, moving essential initiatives on where to look for a youth from the judge to the prosecutor or the state legislature by changing reporting decisions and opening the youth methodology and records. Juvenile courts and state youth treatment systems responsible for monitoring and treating young offenders have been substantially affected by the increase in horrendous behaviorand bad. overviews show that Americans are hopeless with the youth value structure as it is, by all accounts, most confidence building programs for youth are not productive others believe that the orders that youth believe should be the same as thosesince adults and most think that adolescents who perpetrate at least two violations should receive the same sentence as adults. Shockingly, the lion's share also favors capital punishment for teenagers who commit murders. People see the rising rates of offending among young people and don't care. more than quadrupled between 1984 and 1994, the per capita apprehension rate of adolescent gun-related crimes multiplied between 1987 and 1993, more sex-related violations, more gangs, more adolescents involved in drug trafficking (consumption and drug sales) ), among numerous more terrible and surprising offenses and crimes. By the time a teen court case reaches the teen probation office, an admissions officer will choose whether to dismiss it, handle it casually, or hear it formally. When this choice is established the officer checks the reality of the case and decides whether there this is enough data to put the young man on trial. If the court has obtained sufficient evidence to hear the case, a decision will be made as to whether or not to hear the teenager's case. formally or casually. Currently policemen (law enforcement) can warn offenders, report and fire offenders, confine or capture adolescent offenders, and transport offenders to the adolescent corridor. In the event that a young person becomes involved in status granting or an illicit crime, the police are sometimes the first to mediate. The police are very cautious in deciding how to best react to the circumstance. If discipline were to become the main focus of the adolescent equity framework, more legal requirements should be in place, and systems should also be updated in this regard. They would have a more dynamic role to play. Cops would play a more dynamic role in securing the network and channeling offenders into fairness. Using police powers more adequately and coordinating the creative work of network policing with the efforts of network pioneers and other organizations within the framework of criminal equity, and creating or improving crime investigation units within the divisions of nearby police. There would need to be greater police incorporation, assertiveness and interest all together for tougher discipline to be fruitful. Court procedures would prove more complex and could prove even more expensive. More faculties would have to be employed, laws and guidelines would have to be reviewed and more preparation would be required. Crimes would not be made fun of and the reality would seem naturally obvious. Adapt the admissions procedure to make it less demanding for the courts, without allowing excessive numbers of offenders to be sans set. There would be greater association on their part. Today, probation departments choose whether to recognize and enroll teenage offenders in the teen corridor, suggest whether teens should be arbitrated in teen court or tried as adults, prescribe situational choices - home, child care, confinement in area or youth expert, and focuses on the management of adolescents in the adolescent network and detention centers. If the focus of the adolescent equity framework were discipline, there would be a need for morepost-process supervisors and with stricter standards. They would need to implement the standards even more carefully and not let a teenager slip into even the smallest mess. They should be much more dynamic and ensure that everything is done effectively. There wouldn't be much room for gross errors, unlike now. Deposits and grants would be needed for more useful methods of early deterrence. Remediation offices would need to grow to have the capacity to detain more adolescent offenders. There would be a significant increase in the number of young people conferred there. Restoration programs housed in these offices should be more organized and extreme. They would most likely face the problem of congestion, at a faster pace than expected. Treatment of the network depends on whether the offending party poses no risk to the network and has a greater chance of recovery there. If discipline were the focal point of the teen equity system, there would be little to no benefit to the network. It would most likely be in a low maintenance premise with oversight of statutory requirements. The end product might be more shameful to the teenager as it would attract more consideration. This would be a greater alternative once the time has passed and you are ready to be discharged. This would change dramatically with the execution of the discipline. Network-based treatment does not offer enough discipline. A lot of resources would have to be shifted into enforcement programs, but ultimately these projects are more cost productive than most other projects and reduce offending rates among adolescents. The projects that have proven to be very effective are: Big Brothers and Big Sisters, after-school programs (coaching and mentoring) and others already available. Likewise, new projects should be created. Most of these projects are now underway, but are expected to be realigned and prove more difficult. There are unquestionably controversies that are against discipline being the main focal point of the adolescent equity framework. People who are against it don't believe that discipline is the right answer or solution. It does not allow for more individualized treatments or individualized designs. They believe that this is definitely not an effective means; they are just reassuring that further wrongdoing is committed and they continue to move forward. This is not a source, nor a framework, nor a treatment and does not provide the necessary support. They assume that these young people are weakened and seem to excuse the young people. They don't get another chance to run the business with help and their record ends up being open, which stops them from thriving and shows them embarrassment. These are all things considered to organize a treatment based. They feel that being managed and engaged in by adults is belittling, inadequately sensitive, and absurdly heartless. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay I see each of the concentrations being raised against increasingly strict orders, however this does not apply to every misbehavior or to pre-adults. This measure is basically to address the latest points of interest, make the pre-adult system more compelling, show that there are separate results for the authentic exercises, and reduce outrageous and unpleasant violations. The world we live in today is crazy, the conditions are unique and will continue to evolve. At this moment there is the perfect opportunity to abuse the pre-adult value system, which fails in.