IndexCase Review and AnalysisCase One: Use of TechnologyCase Two: Distinction Between Public Area and Private LifeCase Three: Legitimacy of Technological SurveillanceConclusionReferenceOur personal lives have been affected by the development of technology in the recent years, as well as business environments, business principles and ways of working are influenced and shaped by these developments. New lines of business are created with technology. At the same time, companies with traditional work structures are affected by these developments and work environments are updated and developed. With the convenience of technology, it offers new equipment to its employees, changes the working hours of employees and provides convenience. He acquires better efficiency than those who work with technology, and the physical effort of those who work decreases. As technology develops, data is collected on a large scale. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay However, there are some downsides to these developments. For example, this collected data also contains private information of individuals. These types of attachments allow the technology to be abused. At the same time, individuals can be influenced by these developments and use technology in a negative way, affecting work life in general and decreasing efficiency. In this study, we will show an overview of the use of technology in business and its ethical framework. We will examine the use of technology in business and its ethical connection. Likewise, we will examine how the integration and use of technologies in the business world contributes to the solution of the growing needs in the field of business development. As mentioned above, technology gives us a positive advantage in business development, efficiency, time saving and workload reduction in business. However, since some individuals may abuse the technology, this will cause some problems. Case Review and Analysis Technology is developing day by day and is becoming the most important part of our life. We are included in big data globally, along with data collected by us in private use and private companies. It would be impossible for us to expect global companies to respect our data and keep and protect that information privately. When we subscribe to the subscription offered by a store, we are sure that the information we use when we purchase a product or the information we share on social media is recorded. There are strict regulations or rules regarding the use that companies can make of this information; but the truth is that customers have no real control over this and cannot guarantee good use. This situation also reflects on working life. With technology, business owners can reach their employees 24/7. This allows for special legislative intervention. Companies can use social networks to communicate with employees and can use networks to allow employees to carry out certain tasks, so there are privacy risks if the use of modern technology is not regulated or certain ethical measures are not regulated . taken. It is clear that some agreements and understandings between employees and employers should be proposed for better communication and ethical purposes involved in the process. The articulations of using modern technology in the workplace should be better understood and implemented more efficiently. This case study will try to explain when the technological context inan organization can cause a problem and to what extent communication in a company, particularly between employees and employer, can be key to the risk management process. Case One: Use of Technology This case is about a student named Miranda Rusden who works at a university. Miranda has been working for four years and did not expect a promotional promotion from work. She fulfilled her duty and valued the free time allotted to her. He performed tasks such as checking email and communicating with people. Miranda caught and naturally caught without paying attention to her private life, so she almost did not pay attention to the fact that she had a lot of free time from work. But when his manager received a report showing how much free time he had and how much time had been used to carry out personal activities, things took on another dimension. This situation had to be brought under control somehow. Although employees were aware of how much time they spent on their personal activities during working hours, this also proved to be a cost. The result was low productivity. Companies can save a lot of money if employees as a company reduce the hours spent on personal activities during working hours. For this reason, companies must apply and follow certain rules towards their employees. Case two: Distinction between public area and private life Given the importance of social media in people's lives, companies can exploit this fact to obtain some advantages. Social media can be used as a means of communication between employees within the company. As an individual and as a company, the use of these channels can become broader and more open. As a result, any personal or company-specific information becomes public, and a shared post or controversial comment may be unethical. Therefore, there must be a line between private life and public life and individuals should be made aware of this issue. We need to follow the rules of confidentiality, pay attention to what kind of information and data will be shared with channels, and hold our nerve. It is especially important when it comes to sexuality, family relationships, religious beliefs and other important aspects of life. It is up to the employer to ensure that these expectations, policies and practices are well expressed. A strong line should be drawn between the private and public lives of its employees. It is important to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest and that the organization's staff are constantly reminded and informed that any information published on the Internet is made public. Case Three: Legitimacy of Technological Surveillance Surveillance is adequate as long as it is carried out appropriately and responsibly. Over the past few decades, the use of cameras has increased significantly. Cameras are found almost everywhere and are clearly installed for the benefit of employers. Even ordinary workers can benefit from this technology. Cameras are mainly used in cases of accidents, conflicts, thefts, etc. It is especially useful when it comes to. However, the ethical question of how long images are retained, how securely videos are stored, and who can access them becomes clear. How to hide videos or any surveillance tests is of paramount importance because doing so without care can reveal the privacy of those exposed in such media and become a sensitive issue. Although surveillance can be used effectively as a test to determine whether an employee is capable of performing their duties in the manner, 27(3), 327-339.