Christina Hoff Sommers, a philosopher, strongly supports emphasizing the teaching of ethics in education. A discussion of private and social morality is provided. It is argued that although teachers teach ethics courses that typically include topics such as abortion, euthanasia and corruption in big business, there is no focus on private morality. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Private morality is overlooked, and if the focus is on social morality, it will be difficult to equate the two. Furthermore, dogmatic ethical relativists are a common theme throughout the article. Sommers states that “in ethics, right and wrong exist”. Which is a nice statement. However, that doesn't mean it will be true for everyone. This is where the idea of ​​relativism comes into play because many believe that the scale of right and wrong is flexible. With this thought process what may seem right to most people is considered wrong to another person. Sommers recommends the teachings of Aristotle to combat this problem. Aristotle's theory focuses on courage, generosity, and temperance. His teaching teaches dogmatic relativism and has proved naturally attractive to students. Despite the fact that Aristotle's theory is surrounded by controversy, students have never been able to rely on relativism for opposition. It is later mentioned that the teachings of the Ethics have changed drastically over time. There was a time when Ethics lessons were concrete and concise, but eventually there was a steady decline and it soon became an optional class. But around the 1960s we witnessed a rapid increase in the teaching of ethics. However, students continued to be morally agnostic even when confronted with issues that were not seen as controversial. As a teacher, Sommers felt led to present well-considered arguments on all sides of current moral issues. Even by doing so, students would argue that morality is subjective. To open students' minds, ethics courses must establish the fact that there is right and wrong, otherwise the course can fall apart and result in moral agnosticism. If this foundation of right and wrong were recognized, it should produce common moral sense in students. Finally, instead of teaching abstract ethical dilemmas that cause students to face irrational judgments, it is better to introduce stories and parables that help instill moral principles. It is also said that the survival of Jewish culture was due to stories that had significant meaning. . Many believe that indoctrination occurs when stories like this are told. But as mentioned before, teachers present students with a story so they can draw their own conclusions. Literary figures contribute greatly to providing students with a strong moral example. To successfully work towards teaching virtue, behavioral policies need to be enforced in schools, and teachers should not be demonized when they try to teach civility to students. Personally, I agree with what Sommers said. Moral intelligence is crucial in today's society. It is essential to making the world as smooth as possible. It is difficult for me to understand the perspective of an ethical relativist because his beliefs contain many errors. Ethical relativists believe that there are no absolute moral values, what is right for you may not be right for me and.