All countries in the world have different political systems and types of government. So, there are also factors to consider such as history, population, race, culture, traditions and even population. Political culture helps a lot to understand the political behavior of different countries. In comparative politics we can study all these aspects. It also includes behavioral and rational approaches focused on the individual. Addresses the forms of institutional theory used in comparative politics and the reasons why the comparative method is called the “quasi-experimental method.” Furthermore, the reasons why “the art of comparison” is necessary are part of the political scientist's toolbox. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Political culture is a set of people's practices, ideologies, and attitudes that shape their political behavior. It can include experiences, beliefs, myths and ideas. These factors help shape society which shapes their political behavior. We can exemplify the past administrations we have had in the Philippines. After Marcos, we had these clean-cut officials in the national government who are Cory Aquino, Fidel Ramos Erap Estrada, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, and Benigno Aquino III, who all became presidents of the Philippines. All these factors led to the collapse of the Philippine economy or became part of massive bribery and corruption. These cases led people to cry for change until Duterte arrived with his charismatic authority and his use of profanity in his speeches and interviews. Due to the continued traditional incompetence of the government, the people sided with Dutere and elected him president. This is a great example of how political culture influences people's political behavior. Another example is our history where we were colonized by the Spanish, Americans and Japanese. We were victims of deprivation and abuse that led our ancestors to fight back. If we can look at the history of the Philippines, the most interesting thing is how foreign countries colonized us and our experiences in the midst of colonization. The story and this information have nourished our minds and completely influence our attitude. If we are oppressed or if our rights as human beings are violated, we tend to react. The beauty is the digital revolution that is happening right now during the pandemic. Due to government incompetence, the transformation of the anti-terrorism bill into a law giving authority to policemen and military to arrest anyone without due process, and the arrests of activists have given a signal to people to speak out and fight for these injustices. and rational choice approaches both focus on the individual. The behavioral approach basically addresses the behavior of an individual. It suggests that to understand development we must observe behavior. On the other hand, the rational choice approach views behavior as intentional. It says that individuals have goals and take actions to act on their choices to achieve their goals. Fundamentally, these are the goals and decisions of an individual who also manifests sociological and psychological approaches. Both can focus on a person or individual, but they differ. The behavioral approach mainly focuses on observing behavior while the rational choice approach finds the reason behind someone's developmental actions which is mainly related to achieving goals or dreams.The forms of institutional theory used in comparative politics have made an enormous contribution. What influences the institution is more the central role of the institution than the politics that shape individual behavior. It is the way individuals interact with the institution. The forms of institutional approaches are composed of cultural, cognitive, normative and regulative elements. Cultural cognition indicates the ability of individuals to create beliefs about social dangers that reflect and reinforce their commitments to a particular vision of the ideal society. Normative theory defines good decisions as those that are most likely to provide the decision-making process with desired outcomes. Regulatory elements are associated with rapid or episodic changes. Includes changes in workplace habits or norms. The comparative method in the study of comparative politics is extremely important. It is the manifestation of comparing different cases and searching for the similarities and differences in order to get answers under your scrutiny. It brings out the best and worst in the system through different cases. It can be used to be educated and competent and put it into practice. It is also often called “quasi-experimental” because it focuses on the social sciences and disciplines. We use comparison between different groups, individuals and countries. It describes the real problem when comparing different countries or individuals. They differ because the regulatory focus is on work policies and rules, the normative focus on work norms and habits, and finally the cognitive focus on beliefs and values. They are all part of the context of the human system, one that has the element of dissatisfaction, resistance to change, capacity for change and organizational change. The art of comparison is certainly a very useful and necessary part of any political scientist's toolbox. As a political scientist or future political scientist, the art of comparison can be used to distinguish what is good or not. It means identifying the pros and cons of each political action of different governments. By studying another country's political system and behavior, we come to know their successes and failures that we can apply or reflect in our own country; Philippines. The best example we can use is how different governments of different nations acted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Let's learn about their techniques and, if deemed effective, we can apply them to our country. This is absolutely necessary because the active cases of COVID-19 in our country are undeniably huge. Thousands of positive COVID-19 cases are added every day. Our country has not yet even reached the second wave, which means that we are terribly far from defeating the virus, also considering the fact that we only rely on other countries that produce vaccines. We can use Vietnam as inspiration as their COVID-19 positivity cases are really low and how they have become so proficient in tracking confirmed positive cases in their country. They are a small country and close to China, but they are defeating the virus. We need to look at their country as a model and do research about it. Political comparative subject matter has provided us with the most learning and education that we can apply in the real world. As a future political scientist, I believe the topic is extremely useful not only for me or the career path I am embarking on, but for the entire nation. Educate people that learning the political culture of other countries is never wrong and would give a huge advantage to our country. However, there are people in government like Cynthia Villar who are degrading research and.