IndexOverviewDiscussionConclusionReferencesIn this essay I will write about the dilemmas that three companies faced. And let's give some analysis, look at the moral values ​​of the leaders through these events and talk about human nature. Is unethical a violation of the rules? This is really an issue that makes many people feel contradictory. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay OverviewIn Baike, Baidu.com, business ethics refers to the application of accepted ethics to specific business scenarios and activities. Business ethics begins with analyzing the nature of business and early behaviors of business activities and provides people with business ethics codes that determine whether business activities comply with ethical standards. By moral behavior we mean morally significant activities towards others and society which manifest themselves under the control profile of a certain moral conscience. It is the external concrete manifestation of human moral knowledge, a means to achieve moral motivation, and is opposed to "immoral behavior". Including two categories of moral behavior and immoral behavior. Different ages, nations, societies and classes have different standards for these two types of behavior. In general, moral behavior is behavior that is beneficial to others and to society and vice versa. I read a newspaper with the title Why must human beings be moral? This article gave me some new inspirations about ethics and I believe it is closely related to business ethics. Human beings have greed and desire. Managing a business is linked to the acquisition of benefits. Human nature and the dark side will be revealed. I believe the existence of business ethics has two forms. First, morality is just a tool and not worth pursuing. Secondly, people obey him. Morality is just avoiding being punished. If immorality is for his benefit, anyone will violate it. Discussion There is also an ethical dilemma in the field of education that I have come into contact with, and that's for sure. This interests me very much, I searched for relevant materials on Wikipedia and made some conclusions. Ethical dilemma, also known as moral paradox, refers to a situation in which there is a clear conflict between different moral orders and if one is observed, the other will be violated. In any case, the actions may conflict with your values ​​and morals. More famous is the tram problem. The formalization of the ethical dilemma is as follows: A is a moral necessity. B is also a moral necessity. However, I can't do A and B at the same time. The company I work for is one big lesson chain. It started development in 1998 and opened more than 200 branches in 2018 and expanded to Indonesia and Singapore. This is the first place in Malaysia's educational community. But in 2019 this year, the company was involved in large-scale fraud cases. Over the years the company has recruited some poor but good graduates so that these employees can have job opportunities and study in foreign universities, but the so-called foreign universities are fake. Even the diplomas are fake. Part of the monthly salary paid for college tuition is put into the pockets of the group's management, and some inexperienced professors are hired to teach so that these newly graduated kids are deceived. This is a big scandal in education. Around 2,000 victims were unable to receive compensation and were left with nothing. After the incident, the media and victims attacked only the president of the group, and the management concernedshe didn't get involved and doesn't regret it. In response to this question, as a victim, I want to analyze this case from an objective perspective. After After the incident, should the president, as leader, take full responsibility? How do you feel about it? The victims did not investigate the origin of the diploma and discovered that it was a scam. Should they be compensated? First, the leader is the main image and character of the entire enterprise. When this happened, the entrepreneurs did not dare to face the media and the public because they made moral mistakes and chose to run away. In the end, the leader still has to shoulder most of the responsibility, because many decisions are made by the leader and the rest of the party also has to courageously admit their mistakes. Secondly, the occurrence of this incident makes people believe that people are full of selfish desires and morality is just a beautiful coat. The image created by this president is low-key, intelligent and mature, which angers and disappoints many employees. Therefore, we must be very vigilant in this society. Some people like to use the masks of good people to disguise themselves and make people believe them because they know human nature too well. I like to study the weaknesses of human nature and the reaction to things. Third, the diploma is personal and the future is personal. As students of diploma authenticity, we should have the responsibility to investigate and make a choice. Many paths are chosen by individuals. If we make mistakes, we should also self-reflect and learn from mistakes. Compensation is needed, and victims are also part of a group willing to learn, so they will choose to work part-time to reduce their burden. However, it should be difficult to get compensation. Let's consider the next case. In 1989, a huge oil tanker named Exxon Valdez suffered a major crude oil spill in the Brooks William Sea, United States, and the sea water was severely polluted. It is a disastrous blow for the inhabitants. This ship is the latest and most advanced in the fleet. But because of the large, bulky hull, the oil-laden ship took a minute to react to changes in course. After the ship left port, the tanker radioed for a transshipment from the Coast Guard to avoid floating ice in the ship's home channel. With permission, Valdez changed course. A few minutes later, the Coast Guard lost contact with the tanker's radar. Valdez struck a coral reef in Williams Gulf. At this time, the captain remained in the cabin. After the accident, Exxon's attitude towards the serious accident was inconsistent: at first they reacted strongly and expressed concern; then they hastily shirked responsibility, and finally reluctantly accepted the oil pollution removal job. But this attitude made Exxon unable to restore the company's image after paying a huge cleanup fee of up to $2.5 billion. It leaves a reputation for indifference toward the environment. In conjunction with this case, how do you think companies should treat environmental protection issues? If you were an advisor to the president of Exxon, how would you advise him on the crisis? When did the accident occur , did it mean that the organization did something unethical? First, environmental issues have become a topic of concern for everyone. As environmental issues worsen, the public is increasingly inclined to protect the environment. This puts more pressure on companies to take environmental issues more seriously. Environmental issuesrequire companies to change their production technologies and reduce interference and environmental pollution during production, consumption and transportation. Exxon executives might think it's just the killing of some seabirds, and there's no need to make a fuss as long as there are no injuries. The company's repeated delays and apologies not only failed to win public understanding, but were blamed and damaged the company's image. Second, the harshest criticism of Exxon was their indifferent attitude. If the company president can quickly show up at the accident site and is very concerned about the developments, this is more effective than company advertising. Although the pollution-related incident is serious, it also means that the opportunity to improve the company's reputation and establish a business relationship environment is here. It is necessary to abandon short-term interests and sincerely save the crisis and maintain an open and frank attitude, otherwise the company will be in a reputation-destroying crisis. Third, after the accident, it caused harm to society, and no matter how serious the crime, it is morally difficult to blame it. The situation in Valdez is more complicated and there are many default zones. If preventive training is done in advance and onboard facilities are inspected, each member has a sense of responsibility and the oil spill may not occur. Even if this happens, it will be effectively controlled and the pollution of the environment will not be so serious. Exxon is the most responsible organization… Let's look at the latest case. In the spring of 1994, at a public hospital in Harlingen, in the north of the Netherlands, the director discovered that hospital staff had disclosed patient donations. Only a few dozen forints are stolen every week. However, the principal also attached great importance. These donations are intended to reward hospital healthcare workers during the Christmas period. The hospital quietly installed a video surveillance device while the police contacted it. The hospital had initially decided that whoever the thief was, he would be expelled as soon as he was found. Then the truth became clear: the thief was the only neurologist in the hospital. The hospital's board of directors was surprised because if the neurologist had been fired, it would have meant that the hospital's neurological clinic would have had to be closed, 20 employees would have been unemployed for a long time and patients would have been forced to hospitalize in a hospital. rival hospital 25 kilometers away consult a doctor. The council argued for a long time and finally left the doctor. The hospital explained to the public that it knew the dangers of abandoning such a person, but insisted that retaining the doctor was for strategic considerations and, although it had serious moral consequences, everything was dominated by the strategic interests of the doctor. 'hospital. would you evaluate the decisions made by the hospital board? What would you do if you were a board member? What do you think about the popularity of business which often prevails over strategic choices over ethics? First of all, the hospital did not fire the doctor because firing him would have put the hospital in crisis. This shows that the standard of living of the community surpasses the same weight of justice. We believe that both standards are moral standards. Choosing the hospital's strategic interests includes the pursuit of good morality. Second, the theft by the neurologist himself illustrates his low moral standards. But he can't..