This research paper seeks to design a democratization model for a post-al-Asad regime in Syria. At the same time as the uprising in Syria, a possible transition towards true democracy should be discussed. The conflicts in Syria are not over yet and there are chances that the uprisings will succeed and Syria will face enormous challenges for a transition which could be democratic or non-democratic. It is an essential time for Syria to design a good model of democracy to be able to have a peaceful and democratic Syria and to be able to bring stability, harmony and solidarity without any fierce sectarian conflict between numerous groups. Furthermore, the Asad regime is less likely to survive the current opposition and external observers, so there should be a proposal for what the institutions for a future democratic Syria will look like. The current regime represents more than the interests of his family, the ruling party and the Alawite community whose members have dominated the majority (Sunni Muslims) for more than forty years.II. IntroductionThe brutal regime of Bashar al-Asad has ruled this country for over forty years. The tyrant and autocratic government continued to employ its loyal military forces and its sectarian thugs to crush the opposition and reassert its tyranny. There were several popular uprisings against him to overthrow the regime and start taking steps to establish a democratic government and introduce political, social and economic reforms in the country, but the regime used excessive force and chemical weapons against civilians and killed more than 120,000 people. innocent to stay in power (Byman, Doran, Pollack, & Shaikh, 2012). This war will never end until the trade system and developing industries are put on paper. In this model, together with government interventions, people's work is the central factor for production. and with that for economic growth, since it is the work of people that puts all the other factors of production to work: raw materials, technology and money. At the same time, work and with it the right to work is seen as important for the life and development of the individual, not only in a material sense but also in a personal and social sense (Carlsson & Lindgren, 2007). Furthermore, we recommend the creation of a conservative liberal democracy by defining the rights and obligations of citizens, the rights and obligations of government, election, freedom, equality, rights of minority groups, the role of Islam in this model and the viability of the survival and success of this democratic model in the political world of the twenty-first century.