Genetically modified plants, or genetically modified plants, are plants whose DNA has been artificially engineered, generally through the synthesis of the plant's original DNA with that of another organism. To do this, contemporary scientists search for the desired gene in an immense, already established database that contains the entire genome of a wide spectrum of known organisms. Once found, the gene is usually replicated at an exponential rate through the use of PCR (polymerase chain reaction). The process involves heating the DNA, which forces it to divide. As it cools, the primers bind to the strands, thus allowing the DNA polymerase to create two complementary strands for each existing strand, thus creating two identical macromolecules. Subsequently, using restriction enzymes, the DNA of both organisms is cut (the DNA of the PCR and the DNA of the plant into which the gene will be implanted), which, consequently, allows the aforementioned DNA synthesis. This recombinant DNA is then copied and replicated by the plant and, through artificial selection techniques, passed down from generation to generation, thus preserving the desired attributes. That said, despite much controversy and speculation about how ethical, safe, and healthy genetically modified plants are, their many benefits appear to outweigh these speculations and support the opposite argument, thus suggesting that genetic modification of plants should be continued online. . improvement of contemporary society. The main benefits entailed by the genetic modification of plants are essentially economic. Thanks to this, agriculture is made much more efficient. It allows farmers to produce higher yields and a greater surplus in less money... half of paper... way of defining what this ambiguous abuse is to establish impartial information programs, so that every citizen has the opportunity to develop a unique and individual ethical consensus on the issue. Then, there would have to be a democratic vote on issues related to GM crops, the results of which would determine where to draw the line. As for the health risks posed by potentially toxic and carcinogenic chemicals, it would be ideal to make them no longer necessary. This could be possible through a genetic alteration leading to crop resistance to weeds. If it was done for insects, why can't it be done for weeds too? That said, since GM crops are beneficial in many ways, and there are plausible and pragmatic solutions and compromises to the valid and controversial suspicions surrounding them, their production should be approved and supported.