IndexAbstractIntroductionReview of LiteratureConclusionAbstractThe following work is to describe the social and economic advantages and disadvantages of the Olympic Games to be held in China. The impact of this event held in China was very significant. It provided a tool for job creation, improved infrastructure of medical and housing facilities, as well as roads and transportation systems. China has proven to the rest of the world that it is a major contender through athletics, technology and progressive economics. The model used in these results was the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, China. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay IntroductionThe Olympic Games originated in Olympia many centuries ago. The first modern Olympics took place in 1896 in Athens, Greece. The man responsible for its revival was a Frenchman named Baron Pierre de Coubertin, who presented the idea in 1894. His original thought was to inaugurate the modern Games in 1900 in his native Paris, but delegates from 34 countries were so fascinated by the concept that they convinced him to move the Games to 1896 and have Athens as the first host country. The Olympic Games can be considered one of the biggest sporting events of the year. The games are held in different countries every 4 years and attract millions of people who watch, compete, volunteer or work at the Olympics. The games are divided into two events: the Summer Olympics and the Winter Olympics. The events occur every four years, as already mentioned, but alternate every two years. Hosting the Olympics has huge advantages for a country, but it also has its disadvantages. So, what impact did the Olympics have on China? Literature Review Cities hosting the Olympics can be assured of a persistent increase in recognition and tourism: Barcelona, ​​Sydney, Atlanta and Beijing have all seen this by hosting the Olympics (Champions 2016). The 2008 Olympics were held in Beijing, China, due to the country's progress from a predominantly rural society to an open, affluent, and predominantly urban society (Yambilla, 2015). According to an article written by Wasserstrom (2012), Westerners seemed so concerned with the question of whether hosting the Olympics would push China towards Western-style political reforms, and no one seemed concerned with the question of whether, instead of changing China, China might actually change us. China hosting the Olympics has helped them gain greater international acceptance (Yambilla, 2015). They have also proven to be contenders in the sport. The Summer Olympic Games provide an opportunity to demonstrate to the world how "democratic, open, civilized, friendly and harmonious" China is. It offers the opportunity for China to reap economic benefits through tourism and job creation. According to Sands (2008), for the Chinese government hosting the Olympics also meant a turning point in its economic development. He further states that this provided the opportunity to begin the shift from an economy based on being the assembly platform for global manufacturing to one geared towards providing goods and services for China's growing and prosperous middle class. The Chinese government has invested billions of dollars in sports facilities, housing, roads, mass transportation systems, and other infrastructure (Sands 2008). The Chinese government has prioritized the development of a mass transportation system. Before this system the city only had two subway lines (Laidlaw 2008). Wasmentioned that seven light rail lines (Laidlaw) were added with the start of the Olympics. This had the potential to further crowd the country. A total of 37 were built in China prior to the Olympics and can be used in future events (Laidlaw 2008). They built hotels and hospitals. Hosting the Olympic Games has increased their visibility. China can be important for achieving economic benefits, such as attracting tourists and business investment. The long-term investment from preparing for a major event will ensure that the city and country will leave a legacy of improved sporting facilities (Champions 2016). This will be important for investment in the city to cover the infrastructure and transport fund to cater for the large number of potential foreigners who will enter the city as tourists in the future. According to Champions (2016), there has been significant investment in public transport projects around London. This will leave a lasting legacy for London residents, particularly those in the East End. Job creation is one of the key benefits of hosting the Olympics. As you might imagine, successfully pulling off a major event like the Olympics requires years of planning, investment, construction and event management. Jobs are created from these requirements. Obviously, there would be a myriad of construction jobs available. Road improvements would be needed due to the influx of new visitors. It may be necessary to create more facilities or improve current facilities, such as hospitals and hotels. Vendors will be needed to sell food and other products such as t-shirts and other memorabilia. Parking attendants will be required, drivers and tour guides will be needed. A major sporting event can create enthusiasm and excitement before the occasion, during the event, and for months or even years afterwards, says Champion (2016). It goes on to say that it can also help promote the spread of sport which has lasting benefits for the health of the nation and lead to an increase in volunteering, which promotes civic virtues. The Olympics always see an increase in visitors and media as the world's greatest sportspeople come to town. This will lead to a sudden increase in spending and an injection of money into the local economy for a number of weeks (Champion 2016). Just as there are advantages for China to host the Olympics, there are also disadvantages. City branding is a common practice adopted by many cities in the context of intensified urban competition for mobile resources, markets, opportunities, and attention (Yambilla 2015). The costs of hosting the Olympics can reach the billion-dollar category. The amount of money spent on the opening ceremony of the 2008 Olympics in Beijing was estimated at $300 million (Yambilla 2015). An estimated $22.8 billion was spent on gaming-related infrastructure (Yambilla 2015). It is estimated that the overall expenditure was equal to the total. 40 billion dollars (Yambilla 2015). Host countries see a decline in GDP and an accumulation of debt. Not only do host countries experience a decline in GDP growth one year after the games, but they also fall into debt. At the time of the start of the Beijing Olympics, former host cities Montreal (1976), Barcelona (1992), Sydney (2000) and Athens (2004) were still repaying debt acquired from hosting previous Games. A Bank of China survey examined 12 Olympic Games over 60 years and assessed that most economies suffered from a post-Olympic effect (Nagle 2010). According to the study, Nagle (2010) notes: “In nine of the 12 Olympics, including Seoul in 1988 and Barcelona in 1992, GDP growth of.