Sport is about winning and losing, it's a results-based activity and we like to win. I have yet to meet anyone who says I can't wait to lose today. We build champions to win championships and that champion is taught to be strong, stoic, relentless, fearless and aggressive. These champions will go to great lengths to be all this and more, even if it means using banned substances. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Why do we watch sports? We want to see a great fight. We want to see the best players and the best humanly physical work possible done like in the NRL. I mean, it's brutal, people punch in that sport and we love it, but we wouldn't be interested if it was just a game of tag. This means that these players would need strength and endurance in performance so that they can deal with the problem and continue playing. There is no shortage of ways athletes try to improve their performance. Yes, people can argue that by allowing the use of performance-enhancing drugs in professional sports we could benefit the economy by providing better fighting and play, meaning more people will watch how more money is spent on games. The use of dopingDoping had a hand in one of the sport's darkest moments, the 2014 Olympics, where Russia was shown to have carried out a large-scale anti-doping operation. This situation has not only highlighted unfair play, but has called into question the credibility of a system that aims to prevent doping and protect honest athletes. But doping is not just a Russian problem, it is a global problem that we as people have been facing for decades. We just can't stop looking for an easy way to beat an opponent and that's why we completely ignore the entire problem. So, is there a lack of motivation to catch cheats? We can argue about whether doping is bad but, in a way, it could be argued on both sides. Australians love high performance and we love technology. Why, then, do we get angry when it turns out that professional athletes have achieved their great feats with the help of performance-enhancing drugs and other banned products? Not everyone turns up their noses when a high-profile athlete takes drugs. Some offer excuses: the pressure to perform is overwhelming and the rewards are too tempting to resist. We allow special diets, logically improved workouts, and new equipment, so why ban drugs? In some sports, in some eras, almost all athletes were doped: otherwise how could an athlete have had a chance to win? Doping in professional sports is a useful push that forces us to ask ourselves what sport is all about anyway? When we witness an exceptional sight when we experience one of those moments of grace and excellence within ourselves, what makes it so special? If excellence in sport is the connection between talent and effort, as I believe, then drugs distort and distract. Our shared understanding of the meaning and value of sport will determine whether doping should continue to be banned. This decision is up to all of us. The argument that “everyone does it” is only used to level the pharmaceutical playing field, which provides half the answer. When, more than 30 years ago, the question elite athletes were first asked why drugs were used, the answer was: whatever reservations one may have, no one wants to give up a competitive advantage, especially to someone who may not be talented or.