At the beginning of the lesson I kept the lesson topic “How Science Progresses” in mind as I realized that it is a useful tool for internalizing what is being taught. This lecture continued to build on previous lessons by initially examining the nature of scientific inquiry. This term was completely foreign to me, but I kept an open mind to the area of ​​study. I understood that ideas arise from observations, which are conducted through experimentation. After being informed that laws, models, and theories are generated through ideas, I began to understand more clearly how each step in the process provides a foundation upon which the others can be built. I need to research this further and understand the concept comprehensively to be able to implement it in my future studies. In addition to this, I was able to clarify the differences between science and other sources of knowledge. Science is said to use tools such as reason, observation, and experimentation to build knowledge over time. I realized that this is what sets it apart from other forms of knowledge. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay I previously believed that science was fixed and not prone to change, which is why this was a very eye-opening moment for me. Science is said to constantly progress by acquiring and accumulating knowledge over time. I have learned that the concepts and methods of theories are continually progressing. I haven't been able to fully understand how these things change as such, I need to do more research in this area. Luckily, by comparing scientific progress to building a wall, my doubts were greatly clarified. A brief overview has been given of some scientists who have contributed to scientific progress over time. Thomas Kuhn focused on the scientific revolution and why theories are accepted and even replaced in the future. Many other key scientists such as Galileo, Newton, Einstein, and Pascal, among others, were noted as pioneers of the scientific revolution for their achievements in their respective fields. fields. I was amazed that those individuals made scientific advances in those times and continue to this day. Next, the concept of paradigm was explained. I understood that paradigms are a fixed way of thinking, involving fundamental beliefs that scientists use as a basis for conducting research. The example of the belief that the earth was made up of four main elements, while it is now widely accepted that the earth is made up of several chemical elements, was excellent in showing me a real example of a paradigm shift. I was excited to learn about Gestalt Shift as a concept about the brain's ability to change its perception of certain things. It had never occurred to me that the brain organizes shapes into a logical sequence to allow us to visualize shapes. It was quite emotional to internalize that. Attention returned to the scientific revolution to distinguish different forms of scientific activity. By normal science I mean that the investigation takes place within the paradigm, while by extraordinary science it extends beyond the paradigm. The theory of continental drift was later expanded. It has also been used as an example of a paradigm shift, where it was previously believed that the continents were always in their current position. Scientist Alfred Wegner disproved this and presented evidence that the earth was once a supercontinent called Pangea. Alfred Wegner dedicated his life to proving his theory and, after.