How fantastic it is to discover a new type of superconductor made of plastic. It could represent a breakthrough in science and could be used as a computer chip or a paper-like soft screen. However, it turns out that it is a fraud. At first I thought that what I read could only happen in some novels, but the writer told me that the whole story is real in detail. The book describes a true story that occurred in 2000-2002, a scientific fraud perpetrated at Bell Labs by Schon, a post-doc in physics. According to people's impression, Schön has always been a pleasant person, a mild, modest and helpful young man. How could he tell such a big lie and deceive the entire scientific area? The book highlights many factors that contributed to the perpetration of fraud and the difficulty of detecting and stopping it. The personality, pressures and environment that created and enabled the fraud to spread. For example, people thought that both Schon and his collaborators were “reliable.” So even if Schon attempted to produce “real” data, his colleagues and others would have no doubts. The book illustrates that, in May 2001, Schon produced data showing superconductivity at 117 degrees above absolute zero, a result better than any of a colleague's expectations. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. Furthermore, political and economic pressures contribute, such as the hasty way in which Lucent patented Schon's research, ignoring critical reviews. For many of the same reasons that Schon got away with his scam for so long and so spectacularly. Eventually, the fraud is exposed, the scammer is arrested, Bell Labs is downsized by a research powerhouse. And the author concludes that science is self-correcting, but the danger is that the correction process turns out to be more humane, more random and much less systematic. And it often happens in frontier research. Scientists and managers take risks with bold new claims, hoping that future science will correct the errors, and get away with it. The result seems to be a happy ending, but it still involves a waste of millions of dollars invested in the application of the research. The author, at the end of the book, highlights what we should keep in mind when doing scientific research to protect ourselves from the possibility that a breakthrough discovery reported now is fraudulent. Two lessons are worth learning in this book: first, scientists are just ordinary humans, which means some of them will do something stupid; secondly, it is particularly important that no one can deceive nature, because those who commit fraud would finally be exposed. After such a research scam, some people blame the peer review process. Because The Journal of Science sends articles to different experts for review. This achievement is so remarkable that people should have a critical judgment about it. Also analyzing the process of exposing the whole story, we will find that the strictest inspectors are not the scientists' colleagues, but reality itself. The more important the research result, the more rigorous the reality. Schon's findings have attracted technical experts who hope to apply them to inventions, and of course there will be further testing in the future. This reminds me of similar conduct that occurred in 2014 in China. Chun yu Han, a young bioscientist, was accused of fabricating false data in his article published in Nature. After the.