IndexIntroductionOverview of the filmRhetorical analysisSubject, setting and themesCharacterisation and presentation of the charactersWhat the film wants us to knowConclusionIntroductionRhetorical analysis in the arts and literature is common practice and is part of the director's representation of the environment in which situations occur. Understanding the history of filmmakers is crucial to helping us understand the context and content in which most films are produced. Film provides a form of persuasion in processing social, economic and political situations aimed at creating a mental reflection on the effectiveness of films in highlighting social issues. The film Poverty, Politics and Profits gives us an opportunity to review the economics and politics behind US housing projects. The film directly evaluates the politics, profits and issues arising from the affordable housing system. In the reader's mind, we understand the issues that shape the affordable housing system. The characterization and setting used were applied to represent a narrative sequence that relies on the use of syllogism logic to help users understand the conditions, causes, and solutions to the affordable housing crisis. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayMovie OverviewThe movie Poverty, Politics, and Profit first premiered on the big screen in 1983 and has continued to document the problems facing Americans and the world. community. The director, in this case, is more interested in the problems facing the American population, especially low-income workers who make up the majority of minority groups in the country. The setting is set in the United States, where the author documents the plight faced by low-income workers who cannot afford a home. It is no surprise that housing has been a major policy and political issue in the United States, even when billions of dollars have been allocated to provide every American with affordable housing. The film takes an investigative approach to the affordable housing crisis with the question “how did we deal?” be central to the investigative documentary. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LINTC) program is of significant importance as it lays the groundwork for an evaluation of how politics and business create a toxic environment for the poor. Rhetorical Analysis Subject, Setting, and Themes Rhetoric in the film industry is nothing new and has been used to dictate the use of setting, characterization, and the incorporation of themes that carry the message forward. Rhetoric has also been used in various literary works, but there is a significant difference in how it is applied in films. Wildfeuer argues that, unlike other literary devices, the rhetoric in film creates a container of meaning that allows the audience to “make conscious connections between what they decipher on screen and their experiences in the real world.” It therefore becomes important to investigate the theoretical approach used and the textual cues incorporated into the film to understand its meaning and uncover the intended meanings that influence society as a whole. The episode is an investigative piece featuring interview sessions conducted by correspondent Laura Sullivan among low-income individuals living in the United States. The director aims to understand why low-income people have difficulty affording affordable housing, withaimed at documenting growing concerns about the affordable housing crisis. The subject of the investigation is the affordable housing crisis among low-income individuals, which brings up the topic of poverty and greed as serious problems in the United States. Symbolically, the setting is used as a representation of the state of affairs in the affordable housing crisis, in which case the LINTC program has failed to achieve its goals. The correspondent, Laura Sullivan, focuses on a large city, Dallas, Texas, where low-income workers live in slums because they cannot afford adequate housing. The director's main goal is to introduce a figurative argument that represents a broader concept of homelessness and the affordable housing crisis in the United States. Significantly, this subject figures as an emblem that embodies issues relating to economic forces, class behavior, differences and exclusionary policies in the country. As an audience, one cannot help but identify the theme of failed policies and the implementation of capitalist policies that have left many in poverty. Given that the setting is Dallas, it is not surprising that the director and correspondent's account of the event reflects, quite clearly, the values ​​that shape American society as a whole. The director chose Dallas as the film's primary setting as it represents and documents times and places that will help further process the housing crisis. Suffice it to say that there are practical reasons to use Texas as a setting due to the large number of low-income workers from the Latino minority group. It was important for the director to stay in this specific location to create the heart and soul of the narrative, and this eliminates any alienation that might have occurred from the American population towards the documentary. However, I can easily point out that the setting not only focuses on physical details but also documents the moral and psychological attitudes faced by any low-income individual living in the United States. Characterization and how characters are presented Characterization in film is crucial as it helps to show the complexity and sophistication that underlines individual portrayals. In this film, the director uses caricatured characters to dictate the multifaceted psychological impetus of the affordable housing crisis. In most cases, directors use flat characters, but the situation has changed due to the growing demand for the use of complex and sophisticated characters. In the film, the agent is used to describe the state of affairs in Dallas and rises to the occasion by being realistic about the issue of affordable housing. In fact, this creates imagery as it leaves the audience with a mental interpretation of the situation even though there are short clips showing the dire situation. The use of complex characters also influences the imagery as the work is not seen as inferior but as an update of psychological novels in distinguishing between melodramatic and dramatic characterizations. In this case the director introduced central and minor characters, where the government is the main protagonist. At the same time, low-income workers are secondary characters in the political rhetoric of the affordable housing crisis. Significantly, the director has a specific portrayal of the government and the people it serves as both are faced with internal and external obstacles. Block, Walter, and Fryzek argue that politicians and governments have central goals that can improve or.