The Jack Roller by Clifford R. Shaw is the first individual view into the life of a young man surviving the streets of Chicago, Illinois . Stanley, the hero of the story, tells live memories of his childhood living in a tough home and how he lived his life moving from the streets to recovery offices. Stanley's story begins at the age of 16. In any case, he makes some references to life as a young 7, 10 and even 5 year old. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The underlying component of Stanley's misconduct is the discipline and mistreatment of his stepmother. Stanley had developed a colossal contempt for his stepmother, so isolated that we never take his stepmother's name. He describes his contempt on various occasions, saying: "I heaped against her a contempt which still continues; a contempt which burned so much that when she investigated my eyes she read it there, and in this way she knew my inclination." Although Stanley despised his stepmother, she was a major influence on his criminal action. Stanley portrays his first experience of his stepmother's consolation towards transgressions. “One day my stepmother advised William to take me to the railway yard to break into the carriages.” After several successful robberies, the stepmother began to see their misbehavior as something to compensate. Stanley said the goals behind her required an increase in the withdrawal: "My withdrawal turned out to be extremely productive for her, so why not make it much more profitable?" Theft was extremely widespread in his neighborhood and it was not unusual for these manifestations to be confirmed by the guardians. These ads identify directly with the social learning hypothesis and in particular with Edwin Sutherland's differential association theory. Sutherland breaks this hypothesis down into nine relational words. Major criminal conduct is discovered. Stanley has been shown to perpetrate violations and commit effective wrongdoing by others. The most important part of learning criminal conduct is the underlying code of ethics. In view of the comfort he received from his stepmother, he is satisfactorily trained and supported by his general public. The second and third part of this hypothesis is that the conduct is discovered through cozy correspondence. Stanley now lives with his stepmother and is awash in an area that gives power to criminal movements. Tips 4 and 5 see legal codes in relation to moods of wrongdoing. Stanley is shown moods contrary to the law's authorization and carries these behaviors throughout his life. Recommendation 6 is the differential affiliation component. This is the point where misconduct is more ideal than no wrongdoing. The activities of a criminal earn more rewards and endorsements than those of a decent resident. This angle is most evident in his communications with his stepmother. Stanley is compensated while carrying out a criminal act. Consequently, bad behavior is more ideal for Stanley as a boy than resisting his stepmother who causes physical abuse. Propositions 7 and 8 talk about various people's fluctuation in their personal circumstances. Recommendation 9 agrees that criminal conduct is a statement of necessity and quality. In any case, even non-criminal conduct can be a declaration of necessity and quality. As a young man, Stanley needs the approval and support of a parent, a guardianor some kind of good example. Stanley gets that approval while presenting slights that elicit awe and pride from Stanley's stepmother. This need is met after remuneration or, in Stanley's case, in the absence of discipline. In Sutherland's book, Principles of Criminology, he also clarifies the requirement for young men to be "obnoxious and extreme" by revealing manhood in front of their partners. Stanley needs recognition, especially since recognition is not obtained at home. The younger youths looked up at the more established offenders. Stanley describes this wonder: "The little fellows relished the 'hotshots' and longed for the day when they could get into the huge racket." Stanley had just talked about adoption as a way to survive. Whenever he was rejected because of his activities, he did not feel like a criminal, yet fate had chosen this course of activity for him. At that point he began to lose respect for the world. In his perspective, he is trying to survive, while the world considers him a criminal. Stanley says, "There is no fairness on the planet. The most terrible offenders are never caught." From the beginning, Stanley was rewarded for criminal conduct and held for no criminal conduct. Following the social learning hypothesis is social. Bond theory created by Travis Hirschi. Keeping in mind the ultimate goal of creating a fruitful social bond, four prerequisites must be met. The primary one, the association, is the contribution in non-illicit exercises. We see right from the start that Stanley isn't busy with school, let alone extra exercises. The next prerequisite is connection. Stanley's primary parent turns into his stepmother. Although he is continually close to his stepmother, he never forms a passionate bond. Hirschi says, "If a man does not think about the wishes and desires of other individuals - that is, if he is dull to the feelings of others - at that point he is not bound by standards. He is allowed to go wrong." Stanley can deviate from the standards because he is not bound by them in any way. He doesn't worry about frustrating anyone, since he has no one to disappoint. The following two are responsibility and belief. Stanley focuses on his qualities, but his qualities depend on reprobate conduct. Since his mother stimulated reprobate conduct, this has transformed into his arrangement of central qualities. Stanley believes that these demonstrations are unfair, but as a teenager, his bonds and beliefs towards parental figures have a greater impact than the laws of society. As indicated by Hirschi, the braces are the most critical part. Furthermore, he has no interest in any institutional activities. While Hirschi clarifies the responsibility, he says: "When or at any time he thinks about degenerate conduct, he should think about the expenses of this anomalous conduct, about the risk he continues to run of losing the speculations he has made with regular conduct." Stanley has not exercised any interest in education or the work environment. This, then, suggests the mindset: “I have nothing to lose.” It was only after various incarcerations and disciplinary activities by the criminal justice system that he realized that these activities were not recognized by society. Only when he was detained in an office called "Pontiac" did he reconsider his prospects from another perspective. He stated, "There [in the Pontiac jail], unprecedented in my life, I realized I was a criminal." Thanks to Stanley's close communication with adult offenders, he was shown how to be a criminal, as well as how to be a successful criminal. Besides being"..