According to many scientists, the Earth has entered a new epoch, the Anthropocene. While it is still up for debate whether or not we should consider the era we live in as a new epoch, scientists have suggested that we have officially moved from the Holocene to the Anthropocene. The Holocene was a 12,000-year period of stable climate spanning from the Ice Age to recent history. During this period all human civilization occurred. However, because of this civilization, we have entered a state of instability in our environment that includes an acceleration of carbon dioxide emissions, rising sea levels, the transformation of our land through deforestation, and one of the largest global mass extinctions in history. If scientists “approve” the transition to a new epoch, the Anthropocene will officially begin around 1950. To “approve” a new epoch, scientists must define the epoch by a signal that can be found globally. The Cretaceous era, for example, is defined by the “golden spike” in reference to the high levels of iridium metal dispersed by the meteorite that collided with Earth at the end of the dinosaur age. There have been discussions about what would be considered the signal of the Anthropocene. The most promising sign is radioactive elements scattered across planets from nuclear bomb tests. However, pollution from plastic, soot, concrete and bones from domestic chickens are taken into account. The beginning of a new era in human history is a very important but also terrifying experience because, for the first time in history, this era was created by man. Professor Chris Rapley tells the Guardian: “Given that the planet is our life support system – we are essentially the crew of a large spaceship – interference with its functioning at this level and scale is highly significant. If you or I were a crew member of a smaller spacecraft, it would be unthinkable to interfere with the systems that provide us with air, water, fodder, and climate control. But the transition to the Anthropocene tells us that we are playing with fire, a potentially reckless mode of behavior that we will probably end up regretting unless we can get the situation under control.” The good news, according to Lord Martin Rees, is that “human societies could overcome these threats, achieve a sustainable future and usher in even more wonderful eras of post-human evolution than the one that brought us. The dawn of the Anthropocene era would therefore mark a one-off transformation from a natural world to one in which humans begin the transition to electronic (and potentially immortal) entities, which transcend our limitations and ultimately spread their influence far beyond Earth. no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Entering a new era doesn't hurt anyone, however, the reasons we are entering it are doing a lot of harm. As stated previously, the overall context is changing. We are losing land, driving ourselves towards a mass extinction, warming the planet, and all of this has a serious impact on the lives of everyone living on Earth. We are losing crops, deforestation is leading to new zoonotic diseases, warming ocean temperatures are leading to stronger storms, and so on. But while it's easy to spot who's getting hurt, it's not as easy to spot who's getting help. However, I believe that labeling a new era will greatly help the recognition of changing global patterns. This recognition gives..