Well, cooperative federalism's response to specific political challenges that have taken place in the past. Furthermore, the dominant conception of American federalism took place between 1954 and 1978. It was a political response to the political challenges of market failure. Social equity is its primary goal, cooperative federalism has significantly transformed American society. During the 1970s, conditions changed and the pressure to expand national power inherent in cooperative federalism changed. Federalism also gave rise to coercive federalism, in which the federal government reduced its dependence. Additionally, state and local governments may not have sufficient constitutional provisions. It could be a political lever to alter the system. Federal regulatory power in the 1970s and 1980s produced a more coercive system of federal preemption over state and local governments. It also funded mandates on state and local governments. When it comes to challenges, it varies depending on the circumstances. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe relationship between federalism, the study and practice of European integration, is complex and composite. Therefore, cooperative federalism has not been replaced by a new consensus on federalism. Over time the system has evolved. One of the most important points of federalism is the division of power between the national government and the state governments. The protections we have in our system against a tyrannical and fugitive government are one of the most important points why the system was designed the way it was. The federal government is also divided into three branches. It serves as a means of ensuring that all power is not centralized in a single person or group of people, as excessive power among a single group tends to corrupt. Our federalist form of government has several advantages, such as protecting us from tyranny, dispersing power, increasing citizen participation, and increasing effectiveness. It also has its disadvantages, such as the supposed protection of slavery and segregation, the increase in inequality between states, the blocking of national policies by states. Personally I agree and support the federalist system, agreeing on its advantages. I think our system is superior even to the parliamentary and cabinet system found in several places in the world. For example, such as the United Kingdom and Canada's confederal system, as well as the one preceding our current system. When the time comes it's a race, there's a competition between states that pushes them to lower taxes as much as possible and to grant as many tax breaks to businesses. Competition can also be seen as a means of keeping taxes low, just as competition in the free market helps keep prices low. Additionally, some states have more than others that tend to increase fiscal costs, such as welfare and government programs. These programs tend to be higher in states where politicians have had more opportunity to use excess tax revenue. We can see this even today as we watch states challenge health care reform laws passed by the federal government when we were under President Obama and the legislative branch previously controlled by Democrats. I would say that this is not a bad thing, I think it is a positive thing and an advantage of our federalist system. Some people may not know this, but special interest groups have had a history of challenging laws they don't like. I don't consider the policy freeze to be negative.