Topic > Reasons why governments should spend money on public transport

Recently the Internet has become more accessible and of better quality for citizens mainly for commercial purposes. Therefore, so far there is no need to prioritize the improvement of the Internet. On the other hand, most public transportation is still lacking in large areas globally. Lack of transportation can cause problems for society in countless ways. It is clear to me that it is more important and urgent for governments to act on improving public transport in relation to improving internet access. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay First of all, when the government spends money on public transport, this can reduce the percentage of polluted air and leave more parking. The more private cars are available, the more parking areas are needed. For example, thinking back to when I lived in Thailand years ago, there was a policy of electing the so-called first car. This policy has gradually influenced the country to obtain more toxic pollution. It turned out to be a big failure. The traffic is too crowded. Although large-scale transportation can sometimes pollute the air, the shift from private cars to public transportation can reduce a huge amount of toxic pollution and allow more spaces for parking areas. For this reason, I am not convinced that the government should rather incentivize the population to buy a new first car, but should instead provide more budget to extend public transport. Another unavoidable reason is that supporting society funding for transportation can definitely reduce the number of accidents. When the car owner drives alone, he is more likely to get into accidents. This is because, for example, car owners' decisions are more complex on the road than those of public transport drivers. If the government allowed expensive labeling and parking fees for owned cars, it would discourage people from buying their own private cars. Although a single public transport disaster can harm people's lives more widely, common accident statistics were more frequently reported by private individuals. The Internet has recently become more accessible and of better quality to citizens mainly for commercial purposes. Therefore, so far there is no need to prioritize the improvement of the Internet. On the other hand, most public transportation is still lacking in large areas globally. Lack of transportation can cause problems for society in countless ways. It is clear to me that it is more important and urgent for governments to take action to improve public transport in relation to improving access to the internet. First of all, when the government spends money on public transport, this can reduce the percentage of polluted air and leave more parking spaces. The more private cars are available, the more parking areas are needed. For example, thinking back to when I lived in Thailand years ago, there was a policy of electing the so-called first car. This policy has gradually influenced the country to obtain more toxic pollution. It turned out to be a big failure. The traffic is too crowded. Although large-scale transportation can sometimes pollute the air, the shift from private cars to public transportation can reduce a huge amount of toxic pollution and allow more spaces for parking areas. For this reason, I am not convinced that the government should rather incentivize the population to buy a new first car, but should instead provide more budget to extend the).