The manifesto genre encompasses not only the textual ability to linguistically instill political motivations, but also provides a medium that connects author and interlocutor in a largely unprecedented part in the early 20th century. While politics has remained firmly rooted in society, the recognition of new artistic and literary forms is a thoroughly modern movement. The manifesto genre therefore not only liberated political movement, but enabled renewed ways of thinking through future writing practices that revolutionized how the arts were perceived. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Adopting such a visceral and raw approach to expression has allowed writers on politics and art to deviate from the formulaic structures of rhetoric, giving rise to the era of individualism. The response of the 20th century arts as rapidly developing movements, from modernist utopianism in the early 20th century to the rise of feminist literature in the 1960s, highlights how the susceptibility of the arts marked its desperation for liberation. The unparalleled and enlightening nature of the poster form has inevitably destroyed such stagnation. In this way, renewed ways of expression, characterized by a revolutionized perception of the arts, created a modern aesthetic and understanding of the poster genre. Conceived in the turmoil of social conflict and political agenda, the poster genre began as an unconventional genre means to challenge and provoke new perceptions of politics. Because of its linguistic persuasion, the form inevitably revolutionized a stagnant and dissatisfied movement of the 20th century: the arts. Pre-20th century literature and art treated genres largely as a textual matter, focusing primarily on grammatical and syntactic structures to evoke values. Such an approach tended to confuse the complexities of literary construction, veiling the importance of compositional integrity. The art form desired liberation from linguistic constraints to take on new dimensions of understanding. The manifesto speech provided the impetus and opportunity for this revolution. Linked to its foundational text, The Communist Manifesto, the form of the manifesto heralds controversy over its definition as a genre. Whether the medium is seen as relentlessly masculine, paradigmatically modernist, or utopian, Marx and Engels undoubtedly provided the impetus and opportunity for the interaction between politics and art. The brink of the 20th century marked a radicalized shift in literature with the rise of Modernism stimulated by philosophical ideas and experimental discourse. Such authenticity was undeniably inspired by the avant-garde nature of the Communist Manifesto. Written in 1848, a time of great political upheaval across Europe, the text symbolizes the height of literary dependence through the surge of nationalism and widespread dissatisfaction with authority. These demands were desperate for an avenue of expression, and Marx and Engels provided this means. The Manifesto's frankness in addressing those who respond, "you reproach us... that's exactly what we mean", provokes in the reader an active compulsion to join the "us" or to become an "other". This division indicates the nuanced submission underlying all manifestos in the use of imperatives and modes of operation to signal the urgency of change. Indeed, such visceral language as a veneer of political motivations appealed to citizens, inspiring a renewed literary perception of language..