Ocean's 11 (1960) was a classic, but the remake of Ocean's Eleven (2001) was very successful in intriguing modern audiences with twists and turns scene taken from the original that turned greed into passion. The latter film considered a modern Las Vegas to be more complex than the 1960s, implying that it was not a replica of the original but a reinvention to better suit audiences of a different era. The directors of the remake film recognized that with new times come new advancements in both mindset and technology. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Both Ocean's 11 (1960) and Ocean's Eleven (2001) are high-concept films based on Las Vegas casino heists, both with the same skeletal structure but slight plot differences that make or break them. These changes, while minimal, come close to the thin veneer of an action film gone unimaginative and boring. In the original, a group of men are motivated solely by greed, while in the remake Danny Ocean wants revenge against the guy who stole his wife, the casino owner. While both films show the motive of greed, the remake seems to show a deeper side, that there is a struggle for love and marriage involved. Putting a romantic spin on the remake film was a good way to attract audiences, especially the alpha woman who prefers the typical chick flick to an action flick any day. In the 1960 classic the group of men was made up of World War II veterans. and unlike that, the later version was made up of rather highly trained and specialized individuals who had a history of previous scams and robberies. This meant that that particular group of men were expert thieves, which in turn made that version more hilarious due to the fact that viewers could put themselves in the perspective of the “real bad guys” as the initial heist scenes unfolded. The biggest and most surprising difference is that in the remake the gang manages to keep the money at the end, and none of them die, which gives the film a much more positive and comforting ending. In the original, when gang member Bergdorf dies of a heart attack, the money is placed in his coffin to be shipped back to San Francisco, but when Bergdorf's wife opts for cremation, the money is destroyed when it is left in the coffin. Bergdorf's character is by far the most viewer-friendly in the entire film and his death was sad, making the ending of that version extremely sad as well. In “The Rat Pack,” no one shows much sympathy for Bergdorf's body or interest in putting it to rest. Being more concerned about money, with so much greed, it made me hope that they wouldn't get the money. In the remake, you don't want them to get caught that bad. 1960s Las Vegas wasn't as complex as modern Las Vegas. The fact that the remake's supporting cast used different names will be quite obvious to those who have seen both versions of the film. It seemed to the directors that the new names would bring out a fresher perspective for the fresher version. I don't know how it worked, but it worked, although I could give credit to other elements of the new version for the fresher look. The original "Rat Pack" had a very "break and run" approach during the heist which seemed easy enough despite the security hurdles at the time. The plan seems too short and simple for a city as large as Las Vegas. For example, safe doors have been proven to comeleft open during a blackout, now we all know that doesn't actually happen in a facility where they hold millions and millions of dollars. In the most recent film, the robbery takes place in the renowned Bellagio hotel and casino. Their method involved breaking through the vault, which is described as practically impossible to do. While the original film showed more of getting out of the casino to orchestrate their heist, very simple, very expected and boring, the newer film, therefore fresher perspectives, had the tech genius hacking into the security systems and monitoring all the cameras, a completely new character whose job was to sit in the safe while he was taken to the vault, and a casino dealer who was added as part of the group as a resource for private information about the casino and a guy who faked a heart attack to stage a distraction. The complexity of their scheme makes the film exhilarating because there are so many things that could go wrong and almost do. Giving viewers that kind of excitement and unpredictability is key to a successful action film. Ocean's 11 (1960) was poorly paced and constantly dragged as it spent too much time focusing on the less interesting parts of the overall story. Instead of focusing on the heist and making it more complex, it was subjected to a lot of wasted scenes. For example, there is a scene where one of the men meets his son and promises to take him to a baseball game. There was literally no meaning to that scene because we never saw the son again and there has been no mention of the ball game since. Many times in the original Frank Sinatra seemed bored while acting. Some scenes seemed to have been invented along the way. There was also a dragged out sequence after the robbery that basically boiled down to Romero making phone calls before revealing to himself who committed the robbery. The amount of time spent showing Romero sitting on the phone felt like a way to fill the film's running time. The unnecessary scenes or even the ones that could have been meaningful if they were short and sweet, took up the time that should have been dedicated to the main objective which was the map outside the heist and as a result made the viewers feel like the band method. robbing was too generalized and unrealistic. The director wasn't very broad-minded or was just lazy. One of the most popular compliments from viewers of Ocean's Eleven (2001) is that the film was very well paced and easily engaging. This version was much more streamlined. The robbery was presented in depth and detail. Every little complication that could have existed during the robbery was addressed and overcome. As previously mentioned from the beginning of the film, the reason was Ocean's intent to take revenge on the man who stole his wife. This alone dramatizes things and makes that robbery even more interesting because everyone else who makes up the gang is in it out of greed for money, but the mastermind behind it all is fighting for his woman and that requires a completely different approach. kind of passion to succeed in crime. It wouldn't be fair if I completely discredited the 1960 classic while giving 2006 the platform to perform. Sure, both versions of the film had an iconic cast. In Ocean's 11 (1960) all five members of "The Rat Pack" in this film, Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis, Jr., Peter Lawford and Joey Bishop were highly iconic during that time. It really calls for a classic film. The filmmakers recognized this in the remake because they recruited George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Julia Roberts, Matt Damon, Bernie Mac, Andy Garcia.