For my comparative essay, I chose to compare a piece by Pakistani artist Huma Bhabha titled "It's Me" from 2013 with a piece called "Dancing Figure" from around 2300-1750 BC. In both of these pieces you can see that the artists were heavily influenced by the structure of the human body and each of them has a sense of movement. Each piece has its own unique characteristics. Both share a similar way of portraying the human figure and each still requires a lot of thought to determine what the figure is actually doing. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The first piece, by Huma Bhabha, gives you the feeling that the statue should be made up of many figures merged into one. The feeling you get when looking at this piece is unnerving. You can't help but look deep into the dark circular "eyes" on what appears to be the sculpture's head. Your eyes naturally move to the bright blue above the eyes, and then down to the almost ancient-looking sculpture below. To me, it almost seems like someone took a historical piece that didn't have a head, took a stick of charcoal, a blue crayon, and a piece of pure white Styrofoam, and decided to put Humpty Dumpty back together. The body of the piece looks as if someone carved a piece of dark wood or a very old and stained piece of sandstone. One of the most notable features of the entire piece are what I perceive as the nipples of the sculpted figure. I looked at a number of images of this piece and found that in a warmer light environment you can very distinctly see the red marks all over the sculpture, unlike the first image I included where they are barely visible. The second, and very older piece is a very small limestone sculpture from Harappa, Pakistan, measuring about 3 7/8 inches or, if you're more fond of the metric system, almost 10 centimeters. It's smaller than an iPhone! This piece, while visually interesting, is much simpler than the one previously mentioned. With no head, no arms, and only one leg, this piece leaves much to the imagination as to why it is titled Dancing Figure. In another era, this sculpture might have had the rest of the limbs and head, but as we have it now, it has none of these key features. A striking similarity between each piece is the way each depicts the human figure. Now, each piece was created in a completely different time and place, but there are some clear similarities between the two. The most important thing to me is how each artist chose to make the chest. It's hard to miss the fact that the ancient dancing figure is a male, and the Bhabha piece is undoubtedly a female, but the way each has decided to do the nipples is almost identical. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay The second similarity between these pieces is the fact that they give the viewer a lot of room to guess what the figures are trying to convey. In Bhabha's piece it almost seems as if there is one prominent figure standing between two others who are not as visible, and perhaps are squeezed into the back of the first..
tags