Characteristics and attributes are seemingly international throughout the world, however, possessing certain traits may lie in construction work, in a sense of preparation to develop a quality, or in destiny itself. Most citizens of a society are born with traits that lead them to act in a particular way or even to lean towards a less than neutral option. In a society within itself, a leader most likely lies, acting as a king or tyrant would, perhaps even behaving in a way where the potential courage or leadership the person possesses overcomes him or her to act in accordance with the situation. Plutarch wrote about legendary leaders, including Demosthenes, Cicero, Pericles, and even Fabius Maximus, showcasing these heroic characters and their leadership attributes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The Athenians hardly regarded Demosthenes, an oracle and statesman who grew up in Greece, as the kind of man who possessed the right to call himself a leader. They distrusted him and his warning about Philip of Macedon, who intended to overtake Greece. Demosthenes, however, continued to do his best to alert his fellow citizens to their plight. Even though the citizens did not believe that he had the potential to be a leader, nor did they believe the warning that Demosthenes had shared, he himself knew the truth. He was motivated to awaken people's attention, demonstrating his decision to act in some way as a leader. Being a leader does not require a person to lead an army or a group of people, but it requires the characteristics and virtues that are often lost in a man until they are recovered or sought after again. Courage lies in virtues. Courage to face what is right in front of a person, as that particular person strives not to be afraid. They bring courage to anyone who decides to side with them in their faith or their trial. Not all leaders are destined to win, even if this is what they aspire to do most. Demosthenes himself knew that perhaps he would not be able to win, to free his fellow citizens, yet, instead of backing down and accepting the situation, the destiny, the future that he knew would be his, he decided to dedicate time and effort to prepare. He prepared himself to lead and die, because he knew that others were counting on him to play the role of their leader, as the citizens now saw him. Similar to Demosthenes, Cicero of Rome was an orator, one who had to earn a living. his title without the help of inheritance or without receiving blessings and wealth at birth. He proved to be somewhat unreasonable and acted on his own initiative, based on his "unjust" execution towards some of the conspirators. Cicero did not lead the citizens of Rome to victory, unlike most known leaders. He had also reluctantly taken sides when it came to the conflict between Pompey and Caesar. Cicero seems to be an example of a man who was not born a leader, nor did he become one in the future, but a man who had a sense of leadership within a situation. The circumstance in which he was involved was the Catalina conspiracy, which later led to his temporary exile. After his return Cicero was met with a vast mess involving the future of Rome. Before any of this happened, however, Plutarch shows that Cicero himself was responsible for and involved in the discovery of the Catalina conspiracy. He assumed the office for the good of Rome. While wanting people's safety and reassurance is a thought many people may have, it means.