Australia must undertake a transfer of rights, comparable to the American one because in reality modern devices are no longer high quality enough, a new transfer of rights would promote the protection of human beings rights by clarifying their rights and ultimately how having a provision of rights would benefit many minority people in our society. Australia says it has a "strong tradition of respect for the rights and opportunities of every person", but there are huge flaws in the way the government goes about ensuring frequent freedoms. The Australian Human Rights Commission focuses on patterns such as the poorer wellbeing outcomes of Indigenous Australians. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay A Bill of Rights is useful when working within a vibrant and dynamic majority government so that it can be maintained and relied upon. Furthermore, since a criminal Bill of Rights would still be heavily influenced by the Commonwealth Parliament, meaning it would be able to track and alternate it, it would now not contain an exchange of comparable impact to the courts as a sacred alteration. Even if we still wanted a referendum to change some of these, it would still have a tremendous outcome for many Australians. A legal Bill of Rights would push Australia to transform itself into a further rights-centred society. In such an accepted public, people would be confident that they know and rely on the rights to which they are entitled, and as a result, the government would face additional efforts to maintain them. In this sense, a Bill of Rights would have both an instructive and pragmatic centrality. The possibility of this being circumvented would be quite excessive because it would benefit many Australians, from young people to historians, and it will be in their first class hobby to know what they are entitled to and what their rights are to be in this country. Australia, similarly to the United States, has a Constitution that is difficult to fix. If we were somehow able to consider a divestiture of rights under the Constitution, it should be difficult to restore them, as has been the case in the United States. The United States is prolific that the choices we make regarding a bill of rights could last a long time, if not many years longer. It is also below statutory law, so it can be changed more easily instead of the long, drawn out procedure of HOR - Senate - GG which can take months or even years. In conclusion, Australia must adopt a bill of rights because our current arrangements are no longer fully sufficient and a bill of rights in Australia would promote the protection and information of our rights to many Australians..