Many people view Iran as a hostile country due to a combination of concerns about the development of ballistic missiles and nuclear capabilities that threaten the region, the hostage crisis in Iran, where the US embassy was breached and Americans were illegally held hostage under international law. These are just a few examples of how some Americans view Iran. This article is informative and convincing as to why we as readers should be convinced that Iran should get the bomb. Waltz explains that the crisis over Iran's nuclear program could lead to three possible outcomes. The first is that Iran would give up its nuclear products due to increased international sanctions and diplomacy. Second, Iran must develop breakout capabilities and test them quickly. The third is that Iran is simply openly testing nuclear weapons. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Waltz explains how diplomacy and some sanctions can convince Iran to give up its nuclear weapons, but it is more than unlikely that it will. Waltz also says that if they continue to add more sanctions there will be even more pressure on them to produce more nuclear weapons. I agree with this point that since they took into account North Korea, which has been sanctioned since the mid 1900's, they are still able to build and test their nuclear weapons. North Korea has managed to build its weapons despite countless rounds of sanctions from the United Nations. The second point Waltz highlighted was their breakthrough ability. The term “breakout” refers to a situation in which a non-nuclear-weapon state of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, NPT, decides to build a nuclear weapon, abandoning its obligations under the treaty. Iran would not be the first country to adopt a complicated nuclear program while building a real bomb. They also wouldn't be the only country to break away from the treaty. The main concern of the United States is armament, so that they will accept a situation in which Iran will cease to need a weapon of mass destruction. North Korea withdrew in 1985, but still managed to build and manufacture weapons. Iran's nuclear program would clearly need to develop a nuclear weapons capability. For eighteen years their weapons were kept secret, but only in 2002 was Iran's nuclear program discovered. Third, the third is that Iran openly tests nuclear weapons. If they did, then it would be considered a power war and you know no one wants to go to war with the United States. While every president from Nixon to Obama has accepted Israel's nuclear weapons, at some point the United States would prefer to see a Middle East completely free of weapons of mass destruction. The most difficult task is to discover a 'stealth' breach in which Iran uses its nuclear facilities. A covert escape could involve all declared and undeclared facilities. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, Waltz argues that we vastly overestimate the dangers posed by a nuclear Iran. At this point the United States is trying to prevent not an Iran that actually has nuclear weapons, but an Iran that in theory would be physically capable of building a nuclear weapon sooner or later. In my opinion, I don't think Iran should have the bomb in general. I am-33521655.